The journal employs a double-blind peer review system, whereby manuscripts are initially evaluated by the editorial board and subsequently dispatched to two independent peer reviewers by the editor-in-chief. This ensures that the author(s) remain unaware of the reviewers’ identities, and conversely, the reviewers are not privy to those of the author(s). Following the completion of the peer review process, the editors furnish the author with both the article and the peer-reviewed comments. The reviewers are also at liberty to provide comments and suggestions within the text itself by utilising the “tracked changes” and/or “comments” functions of MS Word. Thereafter, the author is permitted to revise the manuscript as deemed necessary and resubmit it. The editorial team reserves the right to make the final decision on publication. Following a thorough proofreading process, the article is either accepted or rejected.